Mohammad Azharullah Mohammad Abdul Rashid v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1738 OF 2024 SIDDIKI ATIKA BEGUM MOHAMMAD HAMEEDODDIN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER .....

Mr. S. R. Kedar, Advocate for Applicant Smt. K. R. Jamdhade, APP for the respondent/State .....

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4752 OF 2024 IN ABA/1738/2024 MOHAMMAD AZHARULLAH MOHAMMAD ABDUL RASHID

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .....

Mr. H. V. Tungar, Advocate for Applicant Smt. K. R. Jamdhade, APP for the respondent/State .....

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2067 OF 2024 SIDDIQUI MOHD. MUMSHADODDIN S/O. MOHD. HAMIDODDIN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Mr. S. S. Kazi, Advocate for Applicant Smt. K. R. Jamdhade, APP for the respondent/State

CORAM

: R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

During the course of hearing learned counsel for the informant was prima facie in a position to show that without applicant in 927.aba1738.24.odt

ABA No. 2067 of 2024 holding post of President, he opened bank account in the name of the Trust along with applicant in ABA No. 1738 of 2024. He was able to show that the amount received from the government towards the grant to the extent of Rs. 2 lakhs was credited into the said account. The statement of the said account indicates that this was the only the transaction in the said account.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicants claim that the amount was withdrawn under the signature of the informant himself. They seek time to place on record evidence to that effect.

3.

Stand over to 29th January, 2025.

4.

Interim relief to continue till the next date of hearing. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 927.aba1738.24.odt