← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/725/2024allowed to be withdrawn

Prakash @ Pralhad Gavali v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2025-11-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil , Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere2 pages

44-WP-724-2024.doc Digitally signed by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date:

2025.11.19 12:07:42 +0530 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 724 OF 2024 Shriram Vishnu Khandekar

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 358 OF 2024 Rajesh Sudam Bhujbal

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 725 OF 2024 Prakash @ Pralhad Gavali

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Drupad S. Patil a/w Ms. Srushti Chalke for the Petitioner in WP/724/2024 & WP/725/2024.

Mr. Amit Icham for the Petition in WP/358/2024. Ms. Gauri S. Rao, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. PSI - Ms. Sujata Somnath Jadhav attached to Swargate Police Station, Pune City, present.

Wakodikar 1/2

44-WP-724-2024.doc CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 17 th NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C. :

1.

Since during the pendency of the aforesaid petitions, chargesheet has been filed and since no grounds have been raised in the aforesaid petitions, vis-a-vis the material in the chargesheet, learned Counsel for the petitioner in each of the petition seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid petitions with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging not only the FIR but also the chargesheet and cognizance, if taken.

2.

Petitions are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.

3.

We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the petitions and as such, all contentions of all parties on merit, are kept open.

SANDESH D. PATIL, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar 2/2