Sachin Hindurao Waze v. State Of Maharashtra

(23) WP-787.24.DOCX by LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN Date:

2024.10.01 19:48:40 +0530 LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN lgc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 787 OF 2024 Sachin Hindurao Waze

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr Rounak Naik, a/w Dakshata Dupare for Petitioner.

CORAM

M.S. Sonak & Kamal Khata, JJ.

DATED:

01 October 2024 PC:- 1.

This matter is listed for fixing a date of hearing. 2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that no notice was given to the Public Prosecutor about today's hearing. 3.

Accordingly, we list this matter on 11 October 2024 for hearing. On that date, we also propose to consider the Petitioner's request for interim bail.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he would submit a synopsis of arguments and a compilation of judgments that he seeks to rely upon.

(23) WP-787.24.DOCX 5.

Though learned Public Prosecutor is not present, we request the learned Public Prosecutor to also file a synopsis of arguments and a compilation of judgments that the Public Prosecutor may seek to rely upon.

6.

Since the constitutional validity of Section 306 (4)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code is challenged, we issue notice to the learned Attorney General. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that necessary steps would be taken to have this notice served immediately.

(Kamal Khata, J) (M.S. Sonak, J)