Rajesh Vasant Kamble v. State Of Maharashtra

V.A Tikam 10-WP 978 of 2023.doc VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2025.06.30 13:23:37 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 978 OF 2025 Vinda Vijay Sardeshmukh & Anr.

... Petitioners V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents _______________________________________ Mr. Vijay Kurle, for the Petitioners.

Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP for Respondent No.1- State. Mr. Amey Pitale, for Respondent No.2.

PSI Akhtar Shaikh, Nalasopara Police Station present. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 24th June 2025.

P.C. :

1) Learned Advocate for the Petitioners submitted that, the Petitioners will give a list of three premises to the Advocate for Respondent No.2. That, Respondent No.2 may inspect the said premises and in case, if she chooses to have one of the premises, as one time settlement, of the present case and other disputes inter se between the parties, the Petitioners may consider to offer it to her.

2) Learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 submitted that, it may take about one week's time to inspect the said premises. 1/2

V.A Tikam 10-WP 978 of 2023.doc 3) By consent of learned Advocates for the respective parties, stand over to 15th July, 2025.

( RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 2/2