Md Asad Md Irshad Siddique v. State Of Maharashtra
H. C. Shiv 30.w1877.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1877 OF 2024 Md. Asad Md Irshad Siddique .. Petitioner vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
.. Respondents Mr. Harshvardhan Suryavanshi for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Patil APP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. S. R. Gupta for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 9th MAY 2024 P. C.:- 1) Whether the F.I.R. can be quashed with consent of the informant qua the Petitioner (Accused No.3) i.e. in part, without impleading other two accused persons as the Petitioners is a debatable issue. According to us, such mode of quashing the crime partly by consent is legally not maintainable.
2) In view thereof learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks time to take instructions from other two accused persons. 2.1) At his request, stand over to 13th June 2024. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date:
2024.05.10 17:41:12 +0530 HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV 1/1