Siddhant Mantri And ANR. v. Surendra Kumar Agarwal And ANR.

42-wp-2413-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2413 OF 2025 Siddhant Mantri and Anr.

...

Petitioners V/s.

Surendra Kumar Agarwal and Anr.

...

Respondents ------------------- Mr. Prathamesh Samant with Tejas Shetty, Shristy Gautam and D. Maru, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Gawai, APP, for the State.

--------------------

CORAM

:

N.J. JAMADAR, J.

Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date:

2025.09.19 12:46:40 +0530 DATE :

18TH SEPTEMBER 2025.

VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD PC:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2.

When the Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the petition, since the petitioner has an efficacious remedy in preferring the revision before the Sessions Court, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file Revision Application before the Court of Sessions. 3.

Leave granted with liberty as prayed for.

4.

If the revision application is filed within a period of four weeks from today the Revisional Court shall decide the same on its own merits and in accordance with law.

varsha

42-wp-2413-2025.doc 5.

It is, hereby, clarified that this Court has not entered into the merits of the matter.

(N.J. JAMADAR, J) varsha