Sorabh Kamal Jain v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3939 OF 2024 Piyush Sharma and Ors.

... Petitioners V/s.

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2795 OF 2024 Sorabh Kamal Jain ... Petitioner V/s.

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 18th NOVEMBER 2025 Mr. Ashok Mundargi, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. Amol Eklaspurkar, Advocate for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 2795 of 2024 Mr. Mihir Gheewala a/w. Mr. Vakshay Chheda, Ms. Apoorva Kulkarni i/b. M/s. SSB Legal & Advisory, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP No.3939 of 2024 Mrs. Kranti T. Hiwrale, APP for the Respondent - State 1/3

Ms. Mrunmai G. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 - State Mr. Mandar Mallikarjun Jawale, ACP, Vartak Nagar, Thane P.C.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By the aforesaid petition, the petitioner in the aforesaid petition seeks quashing of the FIR registered vide CR No.675 of 2024 with the Vartak Nagar Police Station, Thane as against the petitioner in the aforesaid petition for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 403, 406, 420, 408, 424 and 427 and 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3.

Learned APP has tendered a report of the ACP, Vartak Nagar Division, Thane dated 18th November 2025. From a perusal of the said report, it appears that the police have come to the conclusion after investigation that the dispute is civil in nature and have accordingly decided to close the case.

4.

She states that the said report will be placed before the concerned Magistrate. Statement accepted.

2/3

5.

In view of the statement made by the learned APP on instructions, nothing survives for the further consideration in the Petition.

6.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

All the concerned parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) amraut 3/3