Chandrakumar Sanjay Tiwari v. State Of Maharashtra

NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2025.12.02 13:58:36 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3010 OF 2024 Chandankumar Sanjay Tiwari

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Gaurav Bhawnani a/w Mr. Hari Rajguru and Mr. Mayanka S. R. for the Petitioner Mr. V. B. Konde-Deshmukh, Addl.P.P for the Respondent-State. Sr.P.I. - Dhemare from Tilak Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, is present. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 27th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C. :

1.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR registered vide C.R. No.152 of 2024 with the Tilak Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 466, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. 2.

On 12th August 2025, ad-interim relief was granted in favour of the petitioner in terms of prayer clause 'c', qua the petitioner.

1/3

3.

Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, states that charge-sheet is ready to be filed against the petitioner and three others. He states that however, to enable the police to file charge-sheet, ad-interim relief granted vide order dated 12th August 2025 , be vacated.

4.

Accordingly, the ad-interim relief granted vide order dated 12th August 2025, is vacated. The police are permitted to file chargesheet. 5.

Mr. Konde-Deshmukh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor further states that charge-sheet will be filed in the aforesaid case, within three weeks from today. Statement accepted. 6.

In view of the statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition seeking to challenge not only the FIR but also the charge-sheet and cognizance, if 2/3

any, taken.

7.

Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

8.

We make it clear, that we have not heard the aforesaid petition on merits, and as such all contentions of all parties on merits are kept open.

SANDESH D. PATIL, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

3/3