Goldie Sud v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1/2 908 WP 3210-25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3210 OF 2025 Goldie Sud ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and ors ..

Respondents ...

Adv. Mubin Solkar a/w Adv. Tahir Hussain, Anas Shaikh, Hemal Shah, Taher Qureshi, Zahid Burud, Yakub Shaikh, Rabiya Bhamla, Mateen Undre, for the Petitioner.

Adv. Shriram Kulkarni, for intervenor.

Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State.

Ms. Rekha Dudhbhate, PI, ACB, Mumbai Unit.

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ DATED : 30th JANUARY, 2026 P.C:- On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant, at whose instance FIR No. 23 of 2024 was registered with the ACB, Mumbai, under Sections 7 and 7 (A) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, yesterday, during the course of hearing, our attention was invited to the complaint and the accusations therein, along with the verification statement.

Ashish

2/2 908 WP 3210-25.doc When we indicated to the learned Public Prosecutor about the involvement of the three other persons, including Manish Walunj (Assistant Commissioner), Digambar Sonawane (Assistant Engineer), and Govind Shelke (Junior Engineer), the investigating officer, under signature, has addressed a communication to the learned APP dated 30/01/2026, wherein she stated that, on perusal of the petition and the material in the complaint, the investigating officer shall arraign the three persons as accused.

The said communication is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification.

In the wake of the aforesaid, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, and the same is disposed of. (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Ashish