Sanad Raman Naik And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

bipin prithiani 12-wp-3353.24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3353 OF 2024 Sanad Raman Naik & Ors.

... Petitioners V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents ______________________ Mr. Kartik Garg i/by Ms. Aashka Shell for Petitioners. Mr. M. M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Vasantkumar Vijay Takke for Respondent No.2. Mr. Eknath Paulbudhe, API, Manpada Police Station, Dombivali, Thane. BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2025.08.26 14:31:35 +0530 BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI ______________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 20th AUGUST 2025 P.C.:- 1) After perusing the record, when we expressed our view that, there exist a prima facie case against Petitioner No.1 (Husband) and Petitioner No.4 (Sister in law), Mr. Garg, learned counsel appearing for Petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw Petition for them with liberty to file Applications for discharge before the trial Court. 1.1) Leave and liberty granted.

1.2) Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty, qua the Petitioner Nos.1 and 4.

1/2

bipin prithiani 12-wp-3353.24.doc 2) As far as Petitioner Nos.2, 3 and 5 are concerned, perusal of F.I.R. and other material on record prima facie indicates that, allegations of generic nature are made against them.

3) In view thereof, Admit.

4) Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) qua Petitioner Nos.2, 3 and 5.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2