Lonappan Anthony And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

67-WP-3446-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3446 OF 2024 Lonappan Anthony and Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

***** SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2025.03.25 10:13:11 +0530 Mr.Hassan Khan - Advocate for Petitioners.

Smt.M.M.Deshmukh - APP for Respondent No.1 - State. Mr.Imran Shaikh - Advocate for Respondent No.2. ***** CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S.M.MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 19th MARCH 2025 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 states before the Court, that the charges in this case are already framed. The statement is recorded and accepted. In view of this statement, the learned counsel for the Petitioners does not press this Petition but seeks liberty to challenge the order of framing of charge.

2.

Liberty is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. The Petitioners are at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law for challenging the order of framing of charge.

Satish Sangar

67-WP-3446-2024.odt However, if such an Application is preferred, it shall be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law. 3.

With these observations, the Petition is disposed of. (S.M.MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Satish Sangar