Divya Sandeep Singh Yadav v. The Union Of India And ANR.

1/2 18 wp 3527 of 2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3527 OF 2024 Divya Sandeep Singh Yadav .... Petitioner

Versus

The Union of India and Anr.

.... Respondents .....

Dr.Sujay Kantawala a/w. Mr.Mithilsh Mishra, Ms.Aishwarya Kantawala and Mr.Mahadeo Londhe, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr.Shreeram Shirsat, Advocate for Respondent No.1-UOI. Mr.Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for Respondent - State.

.....

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED : 19th AUGUST 2024.

P.C. :

It is the specifc contention advanced by Dr.Sujay Kantawala representing the petitioner that the grounds of arrest in writing were not furnished to the petitioner while his arrest was effected, and this is in the wake of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Pankaj Bansal Vs. Union of India and Ors.1. In addition the learned counsel has also assail the arrest Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date:

2024.08.20 20:13:07 +0530 as being violative of Section 41(a) of Cr.P.C. RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER (2023) SCC Online SC 1244 Rajeshri Aher

2/2 18 wp 3527 of 2024.doc Mr.Shirsat, who represents respondent no.1 seek some time to obtain necessary instructions.

Re-notify to 29th August, 2024.

(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Rajeshri Aher