Prasannakumar Sambhaji Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4303 OF 2024 Mr. Prasannakumar Sambhaji Kamble ) Age- 57 years, Occupation-Private job, ) R/at. Building No. A 6, Room No. 5, ) 3rd floor, Sector No. 18, Nerul, ) Navi Mumbai-400 706 )

...Petitioner

V/s.

1. The State of Maharashtra, ) (Through the Sr. Police Inspector, ) Dadar Police Station, Mumbai) ) )

2. Shri. Ashok Digambar Dhobale ) Age- 67 Yrs, Occu. Doctor, ) R/at. Aldordo Society, Yadav Lain, ) "C" Wing, Room No. 201, ) Prabhadevi, Mumbai-400 025 ) ...Respondents ----- Mr. Vijay Garad for the Petitioner.

Mrs. P. P. Shinde, Addl. P. P. for the Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Dipali Bagla i/b Bagla and Associates a/w Mr. Alok Bagla for the Respondent No.2 1/3

Mr. Raju Narawade, PI, Dadar Police Station.

----- CORAM :

REVATI MOHITE DERE & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 4 th DECEMBER, 2025.

P. C. :

1.

Mrs. P. P. Shinde, learned Addl. P. P. submits that the offences invoked in the said F.I.R. are cognizable and that the police had already filed chargesheet in the said case. Statement accepted. In view of statement made by learned Addl. P. P., Mr. Vijay Garad, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition challenging not only the F.I.R. but also the chargesheet and cognizance, if any taken.

2.

In view of above, the Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

2/3

3.

We make it clear that, we have not gone into the merits of the matter and as such keep all contentions of all the parties on merits open.

(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) 3/3