Prasannakumar Sambhaji Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

by SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN Date:

2025.12.03 15:24:57 +0530 SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN 30-wp-4303-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4303 OF 2024 Prasannakumar Sambhaji Kamble ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents Mr. Vijay R. Garad for the Petitioner Mrs. P. P. Shinde, Addl. P.P for the Respondent No.1-State Mr. Alok Bagla i/b M/s. Bagla & Associates for the Respondent No. 2 CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

MONDAY, 1 st DECEMBER 2025 P.C :

The principal submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the sections alleged in the FIR are both bailable and non-cognizable and as such, FIR could not have been lodged. He submits that Sections alleged in the FIR are 501 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(c) of the Information and Technology Act.

SQ Pathan 1/2

30-wp-4303-2024.doc Learned Addl. P.P seeks time. At her request, stand over to 4th December 2025. To be listed on the Supplementary Board.

SANDESH D. PATIL, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2