Jyoti Omprakash Gheradi And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

.. 1 ..

paucity format

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM :

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :- 15th JANUARY, 2025 Per Court :- 1.

At the time of rising at 5.00 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

2.

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. 3.

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

4.

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date.

5.

Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the To be listed on To be listed in the Board category 36 to 41 5/2/2025 Urgent Admission 42 to 51 6/2/2025 Urgent Admission 54 & 55 6/2/2025 Urgent Admission 57 to 67 24/2/2025 Due Admission 68 to 74 25/2/2025 Due Admission 25/2/2025 Due Admission 77 to 82 31/1/2025 Urgent Order (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Diksha Rane Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 16/01/2025 11:30:32