Prakash Vishindas Nichani And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Aned ANR

PAUCITY 21.01.2025.odt KVM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:

2025.01.24 10:12:24 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :- 21st JANUARY, 2025 P.C. :- 1.

At the time of rising at 5.15 p.m., the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

2.

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. 3.

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue. 4.

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date.

5.

Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the Board To be listed on To be listed in the category 31 to 40 04.02.2025 Fresh Admission 41 to 50 05.02.2025 Fresh Admission 52 to 58 06.02.2025 Fresh Admission 1/2

PAUCITY 21.01.2025.odt KVM 59 to 69 12.02.2025 Urgent Admission 70 to 76 13.02.2025 Urgent Admission 77 to 79 06.02.2025 Urgent Orders 80 to 100 25.02.2025 Due Admission 101 to 123 26.02.2025 Due Admission (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) 2/2