Nazish Nafisulhaq Qureshi And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

907-WP-5511-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5511 OF 2024 Nazish Nafisulhaq Qureshi & Anr.

... Petitioners V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents --- Mr. Vijendra Kumar Rai a/w Mr. Iram Sayed, Advocates for Petitioners.

Ms. A. S. Gotad, APP for Respondent No. 1 - State. Mr. Laxman Yadav, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Dattatray Ghanvat - PSI, Pairavi Officer, Parksite Police Station. --- CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE : 2nd APRIL, 2026 P.C. :

1.

At the outset, Mr. Vijendra Kumar Rai states that the prayer clauses in this present Petition are wrongly worded and as such, seeks leave to delete the said prayers and substitute the same with appropriate and correct prayers.

2.

Ms. A. S. Gotad, learned APP for Respondent - State Gayatri shimpi

907-WP-5511-2024.doc and Mr. Laxman Yadav, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2, do not object to the request made by Mr. Vijendra Kumar Rai. 3.

In view of the no objection, leave granted to carry out amendment in the prayer clause, as orally prayed by Mr. Vijendra Kumar Rai.

4.

Mr. Vijendra Kumar Rai states that the amendment will be carried out forthwith. Permission granted. 5.

Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Gayatri shimpi