← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6244/2024disposed off

Veena Kulmethe v. Srinivas Tangirala ANR ORS

2025-10-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar2 pages

12-WP-6244-2024.doc Arjun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6244 OF 2024 Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date:

2025.10.07 20:22:01 +0530 Veena Kulmethe

...Petitioner

Versus

Srinivas Tangirala & Ors.

...Respondents

ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR _______________________________________________________________ Ms. Snigdha Khandelwal (Through Video Conferencing) a/w Ali Kaashif Khan Deshmukh, for the Petitioner.

Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP for the Respondent-State. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 06 OCTOBER 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard Ms. Khandelwal, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner.

2.

Ms. Khandelwal, learned Counsel submits that very limited relief is sought in this Writ Petition. The Domestic Violence Complaint No. DV/261/2023 has been filed by the Petitioner in the year 2023 and the Interim Application is also filed on 17th August 2023. She submits that, till date, the Interim Application is not decided or even the ad-interim order is also not passed.

3.

Accordingly, in the interest of justice, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Borivali is requested to decide the Interim Application filed on 17th August 2023 in Domestic Violence Complaint No. DV/261/2023.

12-WP-6244-2024.doc 4.

Ms. Khandelwal, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, states that two daughters are staying with the Petitioner and the Petitioner is single-handedly maintaining the daughters.

5.

Accordingly, in the interest of justice, the learned Metropolitan Maagistrate, Borivali is requested to dispose of the Interim Application filed in Domestic Violence Complaint No. DV/261/2023 on or before 31st January 2026.

6.

It is clarified that as very limited relief is sought, no notice is issued to the Respondent.

7.

Is is further clarified that this Court has not considered the merits and all contentions on merits are expressly kept open. 8.

The Writ Petition is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]