Dadasaheb Vithoba Ingavale v. State Of Maharashtra

10 Ia-3543-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3543 OF 2024 Yuvraj Alias Bandu Dadasaheb Ingavale ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondents

ALONGWITH REVISION APPLICATION NO. 305 OF 2024 Dadasaheb Vithoba Ingavale and Ors.

...Applicants vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondents

***** Mr. Aniket Nikam i/by Mr. Amit Icham Advocate for the Applicant Mr. A. S. Gawai APP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 02nd SEPTEMBER 2024 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned Advocate Shri Nikam for the Applicant. 2.

Sentence of Applicant No. 2-Yuvraj @ Bandu Dadasaheb Ingavale was not suspended as per Order dated 24/04/2024 passed in Interim Application (ST) No. 6020 of 2024. He was granted liberty to apply afresh if there is no progress within three months. Record and Seema 1/2

10 Ia-3543-2024.doc proceeding was called.

3.

This Interim Application No. 3543 of 2024 is filed in pursuance to the said Order.

4.

It is not clear whether record and proceeding writ is issued or not.

5.

Matter kept back.

Later On 6.

The farad sheet dated 02/09/2024 mentions that record and proceeding writ as per Order dated 24/04/2024 remains to be issued. 7.

Let record and proceeding writ be issued immediately and record and proceeding be called.

8.

Stand over to 12th September 2024 for hearing Interim Application and for receiving record and proceeding. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2 Signed by: Seema Yelkar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 02/09/2024 18:36:23