Madhukar Pandurang Adling And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Shubhada S Kadam 39-APEAL-377-2024 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 377 OF 2024 Madhukar Pandurang Adling And Anr ... Appellants versus The State of Maharashtra and anr.

.... Respondents Mr. Prashant Hagare i/b. Mr. U. S. Khomane, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. Shrikant Yadav, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Satyam A. Surana, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 7th MARCH, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants.

2.

Mr. Satyam Surana, Advocate is appointed to represent respondent No.2.

3.

The matter is kept back to enable Mr. Surana to go through the papers and argue the matter.

In the afternoon Session :

4.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned APP for respondent No.1-State and learned counsel for respondent No.2. 5.

Stand over to 25th March 2025.

6.

Interim protection, granted earlier, to continue till next date. Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2025.03.07 18:17:21 +0530 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM 1/1