Sahil Arun Mhatre v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

k 1/1 54 cri apeal 889.24 as.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.889 OF 2024 Sahil Arun Mhatre ....Appellant V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

....Respondents ________ Mr. Tahera Qureshi for the Appellant.

Mr. Ashok R. Metkari for Respondent/State.

__________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE : 26 AUGUST 2024.

P.C.:

It appears that the Appellant has not impleaded the Complainant in the Appeal. Leave granted to implead Complainant in the Appeal. Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. Issue notice to Respondent No.2, returnable on 24 September 2024. The concerned Investigating Officer shall record statement of Respondent No.2-Complainant as to whether she wishes to engage private advocate or to avail services of Legal Aid Advocate. The statement should be produced before the next date of hearing.

by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2024.08.29 10:55:23 +0530 SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) katkam Page No.

1 of