Dnyaneshwar @ Don Vishnu Deshmukh v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

04-APEAL-995-2024.doc Arjun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.995 OF 2024 Dnyaneshwar @ Don Vishnu Deshmukh ...Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2025 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2025.07.03 21:53:21 +0530 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.995 OF 2024 Dnyaneshwar @ Don Vishnu Deshmukh ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

_______________________________________________________________ Mr. Ritesh Thobde a/w Zubi Ansari & Changdev Shingade, for the Appellant.

Ms. Gauri S. Rao, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Shaumic Deb, appointed for Respondent No.2. A.P.I. Anil P. Rajguru, Sadar Bazar Police Station, District - Solapur, present.

_______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 03 JULY 2025 P.C.:

1.

By Order dated 13th June 2025 notice has been issued to the Respondent No.2.

2.

Learned APP states that Respondent No.2 has received the notice, however, Respondent No.2 has stated that due to financial constraints she could not be able to travel to Mumbai and she is not in a position to

04-APEAL-995-2024.doc engage an Advocate. Respondent No.2 also stated that even Advocate through Legal-Aid be also not appointed as she is not in a position to travel to Mumbai.

3.

In the facts and circumstances, Mr. Shaumil Deb, learned Counsel of this Court is appointed to represent the interest of the Respondent No.2.

4.

At the request of learned Counsel appointed to represent the Respondent No.2, stand over to 17th July 2025. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]