Pradeep Kumar Lalji v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

38-APEAL-1051-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1051 OF 2024 Pradeep Kumar Lalji .... Appellant V/s.

State Of Maharashtra And Anr .... Respondents ---- None for the Appellant.

Ms.Poonam P. Bhosale, APP, for Respondent-State. Mr.Ankur Pahade, Appointed Advocate, for Respondent No.2. Mr.A.G. Pawar, API, Wakad Police Station.

NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2025.04.28 11:37:44 +0530 ---- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 25th APRIL 2025 P.C:- .

None present for the Appellant.

2.

The learned APP and Respondent No.2 submit that, during pendency of the Appeal, charge has been framed against the Appellant, hence, this Appeal has become infrucutous, as it has challenged rejection of the discharge Application. 3.

The learned counsel for Respondent No.2 tendered copy of the charge framed against the Appellant, it is taken on record. It appears that the charge has framed against the N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2

38-APEAL-1051-2024.doc Appellant.

4.

Considering these facts, the Appeal is dismissed and disposed of as infructuous.

5.

All pending Applications are disposed of.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2