Anil Rammurat Prajapati @ Andya v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Neeta Sawant 30-CRI. APPEAL-1090-2024.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1090 OF 2024 Anil Rammurat Prajapati @ Andya ....Appellant : Versus :

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

....Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO. 16667 OF 2024 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3117 OF 2024 Saurav Rajesh Vadnere @ Saurabh Rajesh Vadnere @ Bala ....Appellant : Versus :

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

....Respondents _____________ Mr. Chetan Deshmukh , for the Appellant in Cri.Appeal-1090-2024. Mr. Aniket Vagal, a/w. Mr. Kunal Pednekar and Savvy Kolhekar, for the Appellant in Cri.Appeal (St.)-16667/2024.

Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, APP for Respondent-State in Cri.Appeal-1090/2024. Ms. Rashmi S. Tendulkar, APP for Respondent-State in Cri. Appeal (St.) No.16667/2024.

Mr. Chetan S. Damne, for Respondent No.2.

_____________ CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

Dated :

4 DECEMBER 2024.

Page No.

1 of 2 _ __ 4 December 2024

Neeta Sawant 30-CRI. APPEAL-1090-2024.docx P.C. :

1) After arguing the Appeals for some time, the learned counsel appearing for the Appellants would seek to withdraw the Appeals with liberty to apply afresh before the learned Special Judge for grant of bail in the event of there being no substantial progress in the trial for a period of one year. Reserving the liberty so prayed for, the Appeals are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. 2) With disposal of the Appeals, Interim Application taken out therein does not survive. The same also stands disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No.

2 of 2 _ __ 4 December 2024