Vandana Vijay Paigude v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

S.S.Kilaje 35-APEAL-1120-2024 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1120 OF 2024 Vandana Vijay Paigude ... Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents .............

Mr. Kuldeep Nikam, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State.

Mr. Swaraj Jadhav, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATED : 4th MARCH, 2025.

Digitally signed by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2025.03.05 10:47:00 +0700 SONALI SATISH KILAJE P. C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No.2.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant is behind bar more than four years, yet charge has not been framed. 3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the appellant, call report from the concerned Judge why charge has not been framed against the appellant.

4.

Registrar (Judicial-I) to call report from the concerned Judge why charge has not been framed against the appellant. Registrar (Judicial-I) to communicate this order to the concerned Judge. 5.

Stand over to 28th March, 2025.

( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 1/1