← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/138/2024allowed

Anup S/O. Ramawtar Goyal v. Port Police Station Kakinada Dist. Kakinada (Andhra Pradesh)Through Its Pso And Others

2024-03-13Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi1 pages

1 924 wp 138.24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 138/2024 (Anup s/o Ramawtar Goyal Vs. Port Police station, Kakinada & ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S. Dewani, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. R.M. Patwardhan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S. Monish, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. A. Chutke, APP for respondent No.3.

CORAM: VINAY JOSHI AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 13/03/2024.

Heard.

2.

The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 seeks time to file reply. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 equally seeks time to file reply. He would submit that initially he desires to challenge the maintainability of petition on account of territorial jurisdiction for which he would file limited reply to that extent.

3.

Stand over after four weeks.

( MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI , J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.) Gohane Signed by: Mr. J. B. Gohane Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 13/03/2024 18:22:24