← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/593/2024rejected

Shri. Prashant S/O Premdas Gedam And 2 Others v. Smt. Megha Rajesh Tabhane And 10 Others

2024-08-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre2 pages

1 1 wp593.24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 593/2024 (Shri Prashant s/o Premdas Gedam & ors. Vs. Smt. Megha Rajesh Tabhane & ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Y. V. Nayyar, Advocate for petitioners.

Ms. P.D. Joshi, APP for respondent Nos. 7 & 11. CORAM: VINAY JOSHI AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 05/08/2024.

Heard.

2.

It is petitioners' case that their father along with ancestres of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have purchased piece of land in the year 1973. Later on, lay-out was prepared and some plots were sold. It is petitioners' contention that above named respondents have created forged documents and latter on, they have manipulated the record in connivance with the N.I.T, Municipal Corporation and Government Functionaries.

3.

The petitioners have filed a complaint to the Police dated 01.09.2023 (page 166), however action has not been taken and therefore petitioners seek direction to that effect.

2 1 wp593.24 4.

Issue notice to the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 11 returnable after six weeks. The learned APP waives service of notice for non-applicant No. 11.

5.

Petitioners to satisfy regarding incorporation of other respondents.

( MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI , J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.) Gohane Signed by: Mr. J. B. Gohane Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 06/08/2024 14:47:49