Dadasaheb Pundlik Akolkar @ Dada Maharaj v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:16705 1 923

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2373 OF 2024 DADASAHEB PUNDLIK AKOLKAR @ DADA MAHARAJ

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ravindra Vitthal Gore APP for Respondent/State: Mr. D. J. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Diksha A Sharma (Appointed) ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 01st JULY, 2025 PER COURT:

1.

The report is received from the trial court that the trial may conclude within 8 to 10 months.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, stated that the applicant would cooperate in the trial and not seek unnecessary adjournment before the trial court.

3.

If the trial court does not conclude the trial within one (01) year, liberty is granted to the applicant to file fresh bail application. 4.

Ms. Diksha A. Sharma, learned counsel appointed to represent the cause of respondent no.2 shall be paid fees of Rs.10,000/- by the High Court Legal Services Sub-committee, Aurangabad. 5.

The Bail Application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe