Dhanesh Shah And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

902-CRIAPPLICATION306-2024+.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 306 OF 2024 Dhanesh Shah and Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5580 OF 2025 Nayan Shah and Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Ms. Rukmini Khairnar, for the Applicants in APL/306/2024. Mr. Kartik Pilay,i/b SSB Legal & Advisory, for the Petition in WP/5580/2025.

Mr. Shrirang Katneshwarkar, for the respondents in both APL and WP.

Mr. Kiran Shinde, APP for the State.

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.10.18 10:31:38 +0530

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

16th OCTOBER, 2025 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the parties submit that, the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and Consent Terms have been filed before the learned Magistrate. However, the Consent Terms could not be accepted as this Court has granted interim relief in these matters.

1/2

902-CRIAPPLICATION306-2024+.DOC 3.

The learned Counsel for the applicant in Application No.306 of 2024 and the petitioners in Criminal Writ Petition No.5580 of 2025 submit that, in view of the settlement of the dispute between the parties, nothing survives in the respective application and petition.

4.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, the application and petition stand disposed.

5.

Ad-interim/interim relief, granted earlier, stand vacated. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2