Siraj Abdul Rehman Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

.. 1 ..

paucity format

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CORAM :

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :- 13th JANUARY, 2025 Per Court :- 1.

At the time of rising at 5.45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

2.

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks. 3.

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

4.

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date.

5.

Subject to the above, list these matters as under:- Serial Nos. of matters on the To be listed on To be listed in the Board category 35 to 42 and 44 17/2/2025 Due Admission 46 to 47 17/2/2025 Due Admission 50 to 53 18/2/2025 Due Admission 55 to 58 and 60 18/2/2025 Due Admission 62 to 71 18/2/2025 Due Admission 72 to 82 20/2/2025 Due Admission (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Diksha Rane Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 14/01/2025 12:17:23