Abhijeet Yashwant Parle And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

KVM 25 - APL 502-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2025.07.22 10:56:41 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 502 OF 2024 Abhijeet Yashwant Parle & Anr.

...Applicants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

______________________ Mr. Priyal Sarda a/w. Mr.Shubham Sane, Mr.Rajesh Ranglani, Ms.Seema Dighe for Applicants.

Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, A.P.P. for Respondent No. 1 - State. Mr. Manoj Badgujar Appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr.Ayaz Yusuf Patel, PI, Kalamboli Police Station, Navi Mumbai present. ______________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 17th JULY, 2025 P.C.:- 1) Record prima facie indicates that the statement of most important witness i.e. Notary Mr. R.M.Tiwari is not annexed to the chargesheet which is placed on record. We therefore direct the Investigating Officer to file a detailed reply to Application, placing on record the fact whether the statement of the said witness was infact recorded or not? If the statement is not recorded till the filing of the charge-sheet, why it was not recorded?

1.1) The said Affidavit be filed within a period of two weeks from today.

2) Stand over to 7th August, 2025.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1