Nilesh Chandrakant Mulay v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM 1 / 2 18- APL 625 of 2024.odt by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date:

2025.02.11 10:45:11 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 625 OF 2024 Nilesh Chandrakant Mulay .... Applicant versus Union of India and Ors.

.... Respondents .......

• Ms. Pranita P. Hingmire, Advocate for Applicant. • Smt. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State/Respondent. • Mr. Vinit Kadam a/w. Mr. Vijay Purohit a/w. Mr. Samkit Jain i/b. P and A Law Offices, Advocates for Respondent No.2

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL & S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 6 FEBRUARY, 2025 P.C. :

1.

Learned APP submitted that the charge-sheet is filed, but the copy of the charge-sheet is not annexed to this application.

2.

Therefore, learned counsel for the Applicant seeks time to annex the charge-sheet and to make consequential amendments including in the prayer clause in the application. V.A. Tikam

2 / 2 18- APL 625 of 2024.odt 3.

Leave to amend for that purpose is granted. Amendment shall be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.

4.

Stand over to 6th March, 2025.

(S. M. MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)th6 pt V.A. Tikam