Raghunath Rajaram Desai v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

905-APL-690-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.690 OF 2024 Raghunath Rajaram Desai .....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent ----- Mr. Rajesh S. Sonar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S.M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 20th FEBRUARY, 2025 P.C. :

1.

This is an Application for quashing of the chargesheet. However, learned counsel for the Applicant stated before the Court that the Applicant had preferred an application for discharge before the trial Court. It was rejected. Thereafter, he had preferred a Revision Application before the Sessions Court. It was also dismissed. In this situation, the only remedy available before him is to challenge those orders before the Single Judge Bench of this Court.

by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date:

2025.02.24 11:11:50 +0530 PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Deshmane(PS)

: 2 :

905-APL-690-24.odt 2.

The present Application is for quashing of the charge-sheet. The case has travelled much beyond that. In this view of the matter, when we expressed our disinclination to grant relief of quashing of the charge-sheet, in this situation, learned counsel for the Applicant seeks withdrawal of this Application with liberty to challenge the orders of the trial Court and the Revisional Court through appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

3.

Permission is granted. The Application is allowed to be withdrawn with such a liberty. The Application is disposed of accordingly.

( S.M. MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Deshmane (PS)