Anil Sudam Kamble v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

: 1 :

28 Apl-887-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2024 Anil Sudam Kamble .....Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.....Respondents ----- Adv. Vishal V. Rankhambe, Adv. Aparna V. Rankhambe, Adv. Chaitanya M. Bagul - Advocate for the Applicant. Smt. M. H. Mhatre - APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S.M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 01st APRIL 2025 P.C. :

1.

Learned APP stated that investigating officer has informed the Respondent No.2 about today's date. However, there is no endorsement, whether the Respondent No. 2 wants to engage a private Advocate or wants a legal aid counsel. Therefore, the investigating officer shall again serve the Respondent No. 2 informing him about the next date of listing and also seek the response as to whether the Respondent No. 2 wants to engage a private Advocate or he wants the service of a legal aid counsel. The investigating officer shall make a statement in that behalf before the Court on the next occasion.

by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2025.04.03 14:33:02 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema

: 2 :

28 Apl-887-2024.odt 2.

Stand over to 01st July 2025.

3.

Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date. (S.M. MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Seema