Sandeep Gopal Samrit And ANR. v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Manoj 901-APL-966-2024.doc WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Date: 2024.12.12 19:36:12 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.966 OF 2024 Sandeep Gopal Samrit And Anr.

....Applicants Vs.

The State of Maharashtra And Anr.

.... Respondents Mr. S. A. Shaikh i/by Mr. Babu Singh for the Applicants. Ms. R. V. Newton, APP for the Respondent No.1/State. Adv. Shafi Shaikh for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.

DATED : 11th DECEMBER, 2024 P.C. :- .

Learned Advocate for the Applicants submits that, the aforesaid Application has been filed under a bona fide belief that, the impugned Order can be challenged only by way of such Application. Now, the Applicants realised that, the said order can be challenged by way of revision, therefore, the Applicants want to file the Revision Application before the appropriate Court.

2) Therefore, the learned Advocate for the Applicants on instruction, seeks leave to withdraw the Application with aforesaid liberty. 3) Leave to withdraw with aforesaid liberty.

4) Learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2 stated that, he has instructions to appear in the proposed revision on behalf of Respondent No.2, and if such revision is filed, the Respondent No.2 will give no objection to condone the delay in revision, if required. 1/2

Manoj 901-APL-966-2024.doc 5) In view thereof, the Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) 2/2