Tushar Premratan Agrawal v. State Of Maharashtra

Digitally signed by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date:

2025.02.10 19:18:34 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Chitra Sonawane. 13-APL-1066-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Cri.Application No.1066 of 2024 Tushar P Agrawal ...... Applicant.

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...... Respondents.

--- Mr Vinay Taliwal for the applicant.

Mr Yogesh Dabke, APP for respondent/State.

Ms Rama Subramanian for respondent No. 2 (through VC). --- Coram : R.N.Laddha, J.

Date : 10 February 2025.

P.C. :

Heard. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the complaint filed in the year 2016 was decided by the Trial Court in the year 2024. The appeal, filed by respondent No.2, is pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dindoshi, Mumbai. According to the learned Counsel, given that the matter has been pending since the year 2016, the Appellate Court may be directed to expedite the decision on the pending appeal.

2.

The learned Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the respondent is also ready to cooperate with the learned Page No. 1 of 2 ____________________________________________ 10 February 2025

Chitra Sonawane. 13-APL-1066-2024.doc Appellate Court to ensure the expeditious disposal of his pending appeal.

3.

In view of this, the learned Appellate Court is requested to expedite the hearing of the pending Criminal Appeal No.42 of 2024, filed by respondent No.2, and decide it expeditiously, on its own merits and in accordance with the law.

4.

The Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly.

[ R. N. Laddha,J. ] Page No. 2 of 2 ____________________________________________ 10 February 2025