Pratit Pramod Atre And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
ssm 1 19-apl1891.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1891 OF 2024 Pratit Pramod Atre & Ors.
.....Applicants Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.
.....Respondents ____________________________________ Adv. Pawan S. Dabhade i/by Adv. Nalanda Jadhav for the Applicants. Smt. M.M. Deshmukh APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Gaurav Sahane a/w Adv. Abhishek Roy for the Respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 present in the Court.
_____________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2025.
P.C.:- 1) By this Application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., Applicants, accused in C.C. No.6501182/PW/2021, pending on the file of 65th J.M.F.C., Andheri, Mumbai, arising out of C.R. No.317 of 2018 dated 24th June, 2018, registered with Andheri Police Station, Mumbai, under Sections 498(A), 323, 406, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code are seeking quashing of the said case with the consent of Respondent No.2, the informant.
2) Mr. Sahane, learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No.2 tendered across the bar an Affidavit dated 11th August, 2025 of Respondent 1/2
ssm 2 19-apl1891.2024.doc No.2, duly affirmed before before a Notary Public. It is stated therein that, by an Order dated 18th July, 2019, the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai has passed a decree of dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 between the Applicant No.1 and Respondent No.2. As per the terms and conditions setforth in the decree passed by the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, the Respondent No.2 is giving consent for quashing of the crime. In paragraph No.7 thereof, Respondent No.2 has given her consent/no objection for quashing of the said case.
2.1) Respondent No.2 is personally present in the Court and through her Advocate reiterates the contents of her Affidavit dated 11th August, 2025 and her 'No Objection' for quashing of the case in question. 3) In view thereof, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) by SANJIV SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR Date:
2025.08.19 11:48:55 +0530 SANJIV SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR 2/2