Parvej Dastagir Sheikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

P1_BA_138_24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 138 OF 2024 Parvej Dastagir Sheikh ...

Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent Mr. Sunil Pandey for the applicant.

CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE :

12th JUNE, 2024 P.C. :

.

Not on board. Mentioned by way of praecipe.

2.

The learned advocate appearing for the applicant submits that there is a change of advocates and that although, the vakalatnama and no objection from the earlier advocate is sought to be placed on record, the registry is not accepting the same.

3.

It is strange that despite no objection being produced by the advocate, the vakalatnama is not being taken on record by the registry. 4.

If that be so, the registry to immediately take the vakalatnama on record.

5.

List the application for further consideration on 02.07.2024. Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI Date:

2024.06.13 14:15:27 +0530 PRIYA KAMBLI 6.

Praecipe stands disposed of.

(MANISH PITALE, J) Priya Kambli 1/1