Sahil Anwar Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra

50-ba-145-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.145 OF 2024 Sahil Anwar Shaikh ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Sameer Khatib, for the Applicant.

Ms. Supriya Kak, APP, for the Respondent/State. Mr. Manoj Badgujar, for Respondent No. 2 Mr. Sanjay Patil, PSI, Antophill police staiton. CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

APRIL 17, 2024 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned counsel who is appointed to espouse the cause of respondent No. 2 seeks time to work out the matter as copy of the application has not been served.

3.

The learned counsel for the applicant furnishes a copy of the application to the counsel appointed to espouse the cause of respondent No. 2 across the bar.

4.

Stand over to 2nd May, 2024.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar ...1