Mohammed Aslam Zakariya Naviwala v. State Of Maharashtra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3622 OF 2023 Mohammed Ilyash Bilal Kapadia ...
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 253 OF 2024 Vipul Dayabhai Gajipura ...
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 287 OF 2024 Mohammed Aslam Zakariya Naviwala ...
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1334 OF 2024 Altaf Gafurbhai Patel ...
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4238 OF 2023 Mohidin Azam Beg @ Arif Mirza ...
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1281 OF 2024 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3622 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1279 OF 2024 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 253 OF 2024
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1284 OF 2024 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 287 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1630 OF 2024 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1334 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1570 OF 2024 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4238 OF 2023 Faisal Farook Noorani ...
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent ****** Mr. Rajendra Rathod a/w Ms. Shabana Shah, Mr. Sohail Ahmed, Mr. Mujtaba Shaikh and Umar Dalvi for the Applicant in BA/1334/2024. Mr. Rajendra Rathod a/w Ms. Shabana Shah, Mr. Sohail Ahmed, Mr. Zeeshan Sardar and Mr. Abdullah Maknojia for Applicant in BA/253/ 2024.
Mr. Husen Shaikh a/w Mr. Jindag Shah and Ambrin Shaikh for Applicant in BA/287/2024.
Mr. Nitin Gaware Patil a/w Mr. Shantanu Kolhe i/b Mr. Shantanu Kolhe for Intervenors in IA/1281/2024 in BA/3622/2023, IA/1279/2024 in BA /253/2024, IA/1284/2024 in BA/287/2024, IA/1630/2024 in BA/ 1334/2024 and IA/1570/2024 in BA/4238/2023.
Ms. Megha Bajoria, APP for Respondent-State.
****** CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J.
DATE : 28th JUNE 2024 P.C. :
.
By a separate order passed today, this Court has allowed the bail applications of the applicants.
2.
The learned APP for the State prays for stay of the order for two weeks as the State intends to challenge the order. 3.
This Court has discussed in detail the rival submissions and a finding is rendered that a prima facie case is made out in favour of the applicants as regards alleged offences and also the applicability of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999. 4.
In that view of the matter, no case is made out for granting stay of the order. The prayer for stay is rejected. MANISH PITALE, J.
BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI PRITHIANI Date: 2024.06.28 14:24:19 +0530