Nitish Naveen Singh @ Raj v. State Of Maharashtra

12-BA379-2024.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 379 OF 2024 Nitish Naveen Singh @ Raj ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.01.30 10:30:05 +0530 Mr. Ankit Takle, for the Applicant.

Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, APP for the State/Respondent.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

29th JANUARY, 2024 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently the applicant has not referred to the orders passed by this Court on previous bail applications. 3.

The learned Counsel for the applicant seeks leave to amend so as to make necessary amendment to annex copies of the order.

Leave granted.

Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of three weeks.

4.

Place before the appropriate Bench.

5.

Liberty to mention after the amendment is carried out. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 1/1