Rahul Ramnaresh Yadav v. The State Of Maharashtra

920-ba-678-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 678 OF 2024 Rahul Ramnaresh Yadav ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Prashant Pandey, a/w, Irfan Unwala, & Dinesh Jadhwani, i/b, W3Legal, for the Applicant.

Ms. Supriya Kak, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Pravin Ahire, API, Waliv Police Station.

CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

7th May, 2024 P.C.:

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

When the Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the prayer for bail, the learned Counsel for the applicant, on AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2024.05.14 12:46:31 +0530 3.

Leave granted as prayed.

4.

The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been in custody since five years and charge has yet not been framed and there is no progress in the Session Court as the applicant has not been produced before the trial Court. Hence, the trial be expedited.

5.

Having regard to the period of incarceration of the applicant and nature of the evidence which the prosecution may adduce, it may be expedient that the trial in Sessions Case no. 112 of 2019 Amol ...1

920-ba-678-2024.doc arising out C. R. No. 0559 of 2019 is expeditiously concluded. 6.

The learned Additional Session Judge seized with Sessions Case No. 112 of 2019 is requested to make an endeavour to commence and conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of nine months.

7.

In the event, the trial is not concluded, the applicant is at liberty to apply for bail in Court of Sessions. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Amol ...2