Raju Avghadi Bandgar v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

75-BA-860-24.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 860 OF 2024 Raju Avghadi Bandgar ...Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Others

...Respondents

Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b Keral Mehta, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. Surpriya Kak, APP for State-Respondent.

CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED:- 10th JULY, 2024 PC :- 1) The learned APP seeks time to take instructions whether the intimation was given to respondent No. 2.

2) The office note shows that the copy is not supplied for service to the respondent No. 2. However, the learned Counsel for the applicant has pointed out the acknowledgment as regards supply of copy to the Registry. Be that as it may, one week time is granted to supply additional copy to the office for service to respondent No. 2. 1/2 Sayali Upasani

75-BA-860-24.DOC 3) On supply of copy within one week, issue notice to the respondent No.2, returnable on 5th August, 2024.

4) In the meantime, the learned APP shall take steps to intimate to the respondent No. 2 through concerned Police Station. [ANIL S. KILOR, J.] 2/2 Sayali Upasani