Vikram Babaso Sutar v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

63. BA 1009-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1009 OF 2024 Vikram Babaso Sutar .Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

.Respondents None for the Applicant.

Ms. Savita Yadav, APP, for the Respondent - State.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE:

10.04.2024 P. C.

1.

This Court by Order dated 20.03.2024 had issued notice to the Respondent No. 2.

2.

Ms. Yadav, learned APP has mentioned the aforesaid matter out of turn, as the Respondent No. 2 is personally present in Court. Ms. Yadav, learned APP states that the Respondent No. 2 has requested that she may be provided an Advocate through the High Court Legal Services Committee, Mumbai.

3.

Accordingly, Mr. Prathmesh Naik, learned counsel is appointed to represent the Respondent No. 2.

4.

Stand over to 17.04.2024.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Anand Page No.1