Sainath Keshav Tripathi v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

907. BA 2281-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2281 OF 2024 Amol Kailas Shejwal .Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1061 OF 2024 Vaibhav Vijay Nanavare .Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

.Respondents WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1056 OF 2024 Sainath Keshav Tripathi .Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

.Respondents Mr. Aniket Vagal a/w. Mr. Kunal Pednekar, Advocates for the Applicants Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM:MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE :06.08.2024 P. C.

1.

Mr. Vagal, learned counsel for the respective Applicants states that substantial part of the money which has been received by the respective Applicants has been refunded to the investors. He states that Anand Page No. 1

907. BA 2281-2024.doc a compilation of documents evidencing the same is prepared. A copy of said compilation has been handed over to the learned APP in Court. 2.

Ms. Yadav, learned APP seeks time to take instructions. 3.

On her request, stand over to 13.08.2024.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Anand Page No. 2