Sohel Fayaz Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

906-BA1219-2024.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1219 OF 2024 Sohel Fayaz Shaikh ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

...Respondents

None for the Applicant.

Mrs. Geeta Mulekar, APP for the State/Respondent. PSI Laxman Patil, MHB Police Station, present. SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

22nd MARCH, 2024 by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.03.26 12:07:10 +0530 PC:- 1.

None present for the applicant.

2.

The learned APP makes a grievance that copy of the application has not been served on the respondent. 3.

The applicant is arraigned for the offences punishable under Sections 4, 6 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, as well.

4.

Victim has not been impleaded as a party respondent to this application.

5.

Let the applicant amend the application so as to implead the victim as a party respondent to this application. 1/2

906-BA1219-2024.DOC 6.

Necessary amendment be carried out to implead the victim as a party respondent by concealing her identity. 7.

Issue notice to the respondents.

8.

The learned APP waives notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2/State.

9.

Investigating Officer shall serve respondent No.3 and file report of service.

10.

The applicant shall serve copy of the application on respondent Nos.1 and 2 and also furnish a copy to the Investigating Officer for being served on respondent No.3 within a week's time.

11.

Stand over to 29th April, 2024.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2