Wasim Shariff Shah v. State Of Maharashtra

911-BA1391-2024.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1391 OF 2024 Wasim Shariff Shah ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra and anr.

...Respondents

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.04.04 10:33:21 +0530 Mr. Amol Mhatre, for the Applicant.

Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for the State/Respondent No.1. API R. D. Toradmal, Mumbra Police Station, present.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

3rd APRIL, 2024 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant.

2.

Having regard to the nature of the accusation, especially the fact that the FIR came to be lodged after the victim allegedly conceived, it may be expedient to hear the victim before the prayer for bail is decided. 3.

The applicant to implead the victim as a party respondent to this application.

Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. 4.

Issue notice to the respondents.

5.

The learned APP waives notice for respondent No.1/State.

1/2

911-BA1391-2024.DOC 6.

Investigating Officer shall serve respondent No.2 and file report of service.

7.

The applicant shall furnish copy of the application to the Investigating Officer for being served on respondent No.2. 8.

Stand over to 24th April, 2024.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2