Jamal Akhtar Ansari v. The State Of Maharashtra

908. BA 1411 of 2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1411 OF 2024 Jamal Akhtar Ansari ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondents

***** None for the Applicant Mr. H. J. Dedhia APP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 10th MAY 2024 P. C. :- 1.

No one is present on behalf of the Applicant as directed on 07/05/2024.

2.

Learned APP submits that test identification parade is conducted however, panchnama is with the Tahasildar. But supplementary statements of three witnesses are recorded. This Applicant is arrested later on and it is told that there is supplementary charge-sheet against this Applicant.

3.

Let Applicant to clarify whether charge-sheet annexed to the Seema 1/2

908. BA 1411 of 2024.doc application is original charge-sheet or supplementary charge-sheet. 4.

Let learned APP to file those supplementary statements for the convenience of the Court on the next date and copy be given to the other side.

5.

Matter be kept on 21st June 2024.

LATERON Learned advocate for the applicant. He was apprised about the happening and is asked to collect the statement from the Learned A.P.P.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2 Signed by: Pallavi M. Wargaoankar Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 22/05/2024 13:24:46