Jamal Akhtar Ansari v. The State Of Maharashtra

3-BA-1411-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR BAIL APPLICATION NO.1411 OF 2024 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2024.08.14 10:53:54 +0530 Jamal Akhtar Ansari ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

***** Mr.Ali Kaashif Khan Deshmukh a/w Ms.Hitanshi Gajaria, Ms.Snigdha Khandelwal:- Advocates for Applicant.

Mr.H.J.Dedhia:- APP for Respondent - State.

***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

7th AUGUST 2024 P. C. :- 1.

Today, learned Advocate has taken a ground about not complying the provisions of informing the fact of arrest and reasons of arrest to the relatives of the Applicant. He relied upon the observations in case of Mahesh Pandurang Naik v/s. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.1.

Writ Petition (ST) No.13835 of 2024 : 18th July 2024 : Bombay High Court Satish Sangar 1/2

3-BA-1411-2024.doc 2.

Learned APP has shown to me the arrest panchnama. It mentions about giving an intimation to Tariq Ansari. The supporting documents are not brought today. These grounds are taken for the first time.

3.

Learned APP seeks time.

4.

In view of that, stand over to 19th August 2024. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2