Prashant Dilip Patil v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

911_BA_1441_2024.docx Prasad Rajput IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1441 OF 2024 Prashant Dilip Patil .. Applicant

Versus

State Of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Ramanik P Pawar a/w Ms. Samiksha Pawar, Advocates for Applicant.

 Ms. Rachita A. Padwal i/by Ms Saziya Mukadam, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

 Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for State.

 PSI - Nileshkumar Sambhaji Wagh, Turbhe Police Station, New Mumbai.

...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 27, 2025 P. C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Pawar, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms. Padwal, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 and Ms. Newton, learned APP for State.

2.

Application is moved by the Applicant on the ground of medical bail. It is prima facie seen that Applicant's father is unwell. 3.

Learned APP would submit that reports which are submitted are 6 months old. Be that as it may, on the ground of health condition of a family member, this Court does not take up matters for hearing on out of turn basis in the medical bail category. Nevertheless,

911_BA_1441_2024.docx if the Applicant desires to meet his father he can approach the Court and agree to the conditions of escort, if so required. 4.

Stand over to 1st April, 2025.

P.R. Rajput [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]